WATCH BOX OFFICE MOVIES FOR FREE
Batman May Kill, But That Doesnt Mean It Should Be The Norm
While its arguably the most polarizing entry in the DC Extended Universe, three years after its release, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is still a popular topic of conversation in the comic book movie world, and its director, Zack Snyder, has helped with that. Just last month, Snyder screened Batman v Supermans Ultimate Edition alongside his directors cuts of Dawn of the Dead and Watchmen as the capper to a 3-day event, and during one of the Q&A sessions, Snyder hit back against those who criticized his choice to have Ben Afflecks Batman kill, saying that those who have a problem with that should wake the fuck up. And he is right, Batman has killed people various times over the decades, but that fact doesnt mean that it is or should be his normal course of action. Far from it, Gotham Citys Dark Knight is a more interesting character when he chooses not to kill, no matter what.
During Batmans earliest comic book appearances, when he was written like the pulp characters popular at the time rather than a standard superhero, Batman had no issue dispensing lethal measures against the criminals he fought, like when he snapped a mans neck while swinging on a rope. Starting in the 1940s, though, he adopted a no-kill policy, which was presumably done to make him more appropriate for younger readers. That no killing rule has stuck for the most part, though there are instances when Batman has taken a life, both in the main DC universe and in alternate continuity stories (not in The Dark Knight Returns, contrary to what some believe).
For the sake of this piece, lets only focus on Batmans movie appearances. Michael Keatons Batman had no issue with killing foes, as evidenced by when he blew up Ace Chemicals while people were still in it in Batman and when he attached a ticking bomb to a Red Triangle Gang member in Batman Returns. Val Kilmer and George Clooneys respective Batmans had a slightly softer method with dealing with Gotham Citys superstitious and cowardly lot, but it wasnt until Christopher Nolans Dark Knight trilogy rolled around that a cinematic Batman declared that he wouldnt kill. However, that stance is muddied when considering that he let Ras al Ghul fall to his death in Batman Begins and drove straight into a trash truck in The Dark Knight that almost certainly crushed the Joker henchman driving it. By the time we get to Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, Ben Afflecks Bruce Wayne, who has become more weary and cynical, has no issue with killing criminals, whether its by breaking their necks in a brawl or gunning them down in the Batmobile.
So yes, when it comes to movies, Batman has left a fair amount of bodies in his wake, but thanks to the Dark Knight trilogy, as well as various comic books, TV shows and direct-to-video movies, Batman is usually depicted as unwilling to kill criminals, no matter how heinous their crimes are. Why is this? The explanation changes depending on whos writing the character, but my favorite explanation comes from the 2010 animated movie Batman: Under the Red Hood, adapted from the 2006 comic book story arc Under the Hood. When Jason Todd, whos holding The Joker at gunpoint, questions if Batmans moral code doesnt allow for him to kill his arch-nemesis or if it would be too hard for him to cross that line, Batman responds:
No! God Almighty, no! It'd be too damned easy. All I've ever wanted to do is kill him. A day doesn't go by when I don't think about subjecting him to every horrendous torture he's dealt out to others and then... end him But if I do that, if I allow myself to go down into that place, I'll never come back.
Jason Todd then points out that hes not asking Batman to kill someone like Penguin, Scarecrow or Two-Face, only The Joker, but Batman refuses. No matter how much he hates Joker, no matter how many people the cackling crook has murdered, Batman just cant cross that line. And frankly, Batman following that rule makes him a more compelling character because its an understandable flaw in his approach to fighting crime.
Despite having no superpowers, Batman is usually considered to be one of the most formidable heroes in the DC universe. Give him enough prep time, and he can win just about any battle, and hes fought his way out of so many fantastical conflicts that hes earned the nickname Bat-God among fans. But when you boil things down to basics, Batman is just a regular man waging a war against Gotham Citys criminal underworld, sometimes alone, sometimes with partners. With Gotham City so infested with evil, Bruce Waynes life would be a lot easier if he didnt bother throwing villains in Blackgate Prison or Arkham Asylum, and instead just eliminated them right off the bat (pun slightly intended), but he cant. Hes incapable of doing that, for better or worse, adding extra drama to an already incredibly dramatic character.
Having watched his parents being murdered down in Crime Alley, Batman cant bring himself to take the life of another. To do so would make him an executioner, and as much as he embraces darkness, Bruce wont delve that deep into the shadows. Hes incapable of doing so, even if he comes close to at times (like when he threatened to kill Joker in Batman Beyond: Return of the Joker for turning Tim Drake into a mini-Clown Prince of Crime). Its the same reason why he wont use a gun; if he did that, he would become too much like the man who irreparably damaged his life and the evildoers hes dedicated his life to thwarting, and hes not willing to fall that far, even if it makes his job significantly harder. Zack Snyder tossed all that out for Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, and while that decision makes sense if youre looking at Batman fighting crime through a more practical lens, it conflicts with the spirit of the character that has developed over the years.
Im not saying that all superheroes shouldnt kill; The Punisher wouldnt be who he is if he didnt snuff out criminals, and its hard to believe that heroes like Captain America and Wonder Woman who have been in wars didnt take any lives. I even understand Superman having to kill in rare instances, such as when he snapped General Zods neck in Man of Steel, another controversial DCEU decision. For Batman, though, killing flies in the face of his moral code. Sure there might be instances where hes not able to save everyone, but to the best of his ability, he wont have anyone die at his hands. Besides, if Batman went on a killing spree around Gotham City, that would destroy the already fragile relationship he has with Commissioner James Gordon and the Gotham City Police Department, and that would definitely be problematic for his mission.
Certainly one of the reasons superheroes have endured for so long is because different writers and artist have been able to interpret these characters differently, and change and development is integral to longevity. That said, theres no denying that most characters have core traits and elements that need to be retained in traditional depictions, and while its up for debate whether Batman not killing is one of those things, the fact of the matter is that more often than not youll see him exercise restraint rather than execute his foes, even if the movies havent always followed this rule. Its not necessarily the most realistic and logical approach to fighting crime, but hey, theres a lot about Batman that doesnt translate for real life, and yet we nonetheless still enjoy him 80 years after his introduction.
Let us know where you fall on the Batman kill debate in the comments below. Well see how Matt Reeves handles the character when The Batman is released on June 25, 2021.
Batman May Kill, But That Doesn't Mean It Should Be The Norm While it's arguably the most polarizing entry in the DC Extended Universe, three years after its release, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is still a popular topic of conversation in the comic book movie world, and its director, Zack Snyder, has helped with that.
Batman May Kill, But That Doesn't Mean It Should Be The Norm
Batman May Kill, But That Doesn't Mean It Should Be The Norm
Batman May Kill, But That Doesn't Mean It Should Be The Norm 2 months ago While it's arguably the most polarizing entry in the DC Extended Universe, three years after its release, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is still a popular topic of conversation in the comic book movie world, and its director, Zack Snyder, has helped with that.
Batman May Kill, But That Doesn't Mean It Should Be The Norm
App available in Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the U.S. Guns don't kill people. Batman does.
Jul 25, 2008 · Batman should kill the Joker. How many of us would agree with that? Quite a few, we'd wager. Even Heath Ledger's Joker in "The Dark Knight" marvels at Batman's refusal to kill him. After all, the
15 Superpowers You Didn't Know The Joker Had | ScreenRant
SIGN UP FOR DROPOUT.TV, available WORLDWIDE:
It's hard to believe that Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice was released 5 months ago. Since the superhero team up film hit theaters, critics and fans everywhere have been debating and critiquing
Should Batman kill the Joker? - The New York Times
To many, Batman is a superhero without fear -- but that's not true, is it? It's not that Batman doesn't experience fear; rather, he manages to overcome his fear and turn it against his enemies. That's why the villains in Gotham are so afraid of the Dark Knight. Well, everyone except for the Joker, of course.
Batman vs. The Penguin (with Patton Oswalt) - YouTube
Batman May Kill, But That Doesn't Mean It Should Be The Norm While it's arguably the most polarizing entry in the DC Extended Universe, three years after its release, Batman v Superman: Dawn
Batman May Kill, But That Doesn̢۪t Mean It Should Be The Norm
peoplenetv.com/batman-may-kill-but-that-doesnaet-mean-it-should-be-the-norm/
Home Movies Batman May Kill, But That Doesn̢۪t Mean It Should Be The Norm Batman May Kill, But That Doesn̢۪t Mean It Should Be The Norm Posted By: PeopleNet on: April 03, 2019 In: Movies No Comments
Why Batman v Superman's Big Martha Scene Works, According To
Subscribe To Batman May Kill, But That Doesn't Mean It Should Be The Norm Updates close Subscribe To Batman May Kill, But That Doesn't Mean It Should Be The Norm Updates
Batman May Kill, But That Doesn't Mean It Should Be The Norm
And he is right, Batman has killed people various times over the decades, but that fact doesn't mean that it is or should be his normal course of action. Far from it, Gotham City's Dark Knight is a more interesting character when he chooses not to kill, no matter what.
Batman May Kill, But That Doesn't Mean It Should Be The Norm
0 comments:
Post a Comment